Autori: Nicola Milia1,3, Alessandra Congiu1,3, Paolo Anagnostou1,2, Francesco Montinaro2, Marco Capocasa2, Emanuele Sanna3 e Giovanni Destro Bisol1,2*
1) Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale, Roma Italy (2)Istituto Italiano di Antropologia, Roma, Italy (3)Università di Cagliari, Dipartimento di Biologia Sperimentale, Cagliari, Italy *destrobisol AT uniroma1 dot it
- King G (2011) Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences. Science 331: 719–721. oi:10.1126/science.1197872.
- Merton RK (1942) reprinted in The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press. 1972 pag 267–278.
- Norman C (1985) Sharing research data urged. Science 229: 632. doi:10.1126/science.229.4714.632.
- Marshall E (1990) Data sharing: a declining ethic? Science 248: 952–957.
- DOE, Human Genome News, January 1993, 4.
- Pennisi E (2009) Data sharing. Group calls for rapid release of more genomics data. Science 324: 1000–1001. doi:10.1126/science.324_1000b.
- International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing, Bermuda, 25 to 28 February 1996; Human Genome Project Information website. Available:www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/research/bermuda.shtml#1. Accessed 2012 January, 3.
- Piwowar HA, Chapman WW (2008) Proceedings of the ELPUB 2008 Conference on Electronic Publishing. Toronto (ON), 25–27 June.
- Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, et al. (2011) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D38–51. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1172.
- Piwowar HA, Vision TJ, Whitlock MC (2011) Data archiving is a good investment. Nature 473: 285. doi:10.1038/473285a.
- Fischer BA, Zigmond MJ (2010) The essential nature of sharing in science. SciEng Ethics 16: 783–799. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9239-x. Piwowar HA, Day RS, Fridsma DB (2007) Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE 2: e308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308.
- Giffels J (2010) Sharing data is a shared responsibility: Commentary on: «The essential nature of sharing in science». Sci Eng Ethics 16: 801–803. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9230-6.
- Nelson B (2009) Data sharing: Empty archives. Nature 461: 160–163. doi:10.1038/461160a.
- Murdoch C, Caulfield T (2009) Commercialization, patenting and genomics: researcher perspectives. Genome Med 1: 22. doi:10.1186/gm22.
- Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, Wu L, et al. (2011) Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. PLoS ONE 6(6): e21101. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101.
- Savage CJ, Vickers AJ (2009) Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. PLoS ONE 4: e7078. doi:10.1371/journal.- pone.0007078.
- Alsheikh-Ali AA, Qureshi W, Al-Mallah MH, Ioannidis JPA (2011) Public Availability of Published Research Data in High-Impact Journals. PLoS ONE 6(9): e24357. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024357.
- Peltonen L (2001) The molecular dissection of human diseases after the human genome project. Pharmacogenomics J 1: 5–6.
- Nelson MR, Bryc K, King KS, Indap A, Boyko AR, et al. (2008) The Population Reference Sample, POPRES: a resource for population, disease, and pharmacological genetics research. Am J Hum Genet 83: 347–358. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.005.
- Campbell EG, Clarridge BR, Gokhale M, Birenbaum L, Hilgartner S, et al. (2002) Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. JAMA 287: 473–480.
- Mishmar D, Zhidkov I (2010) Evolution and disease converge in the mitochondrion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1797: 1099–1104. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio. 2010.01.003.
- King TE, Jobling MA (2009) What’s in a name? Y chromosomes, surnames and the genetic genealogy revolution. Trends Genet 25: 351–360. doi:10.1016/ j.tig.2009.06.003.
- Destro-Bisol G, Jobling MA, Rocha J, Novembre J, Richards MB, et al. (2010)Molecular anthropology in the genomic era. J Anthropol Sci 88: 93–112.
Available at http://www.isita-org.com/jass/Contents/2010vol88/PDFonline/Jass2010_08_Destro-Bisol.pdf.
- Hoban S, Bertorelle G, Gaggiotti OE (2012) Computer simulations: tools for population and evolutionary genetics. Nat Rev Genet 13: 110–122. doi: 10.1038/nrg3130.
- Tofanelli S, Taglioli L, Merlitti D, Paoli G (2011) Tools which simulate the evolution of uni-parentally transmitted elements of the human genome. J Anthropol Sci. 2011;89:201–19. doi:10.4 436/jass.8 901.
- Ntzani EE, Ioannidis JP (2003) Predictive ability of DNA microarrays for cancer outcomes and correlates: an empirical assessment. The Lancet 362: 1439–1444. doi:16/S0140-6736(03)14686-7.
- Noor MAF, Zimmerman KJ, Teeter KC (2006) Data sharing: how much doesn’t get submitted to GenBank? PLoS Biol 4: e228. doi:10.1371/journal. pbio.0040228.
- Wicherts JM, Borsboom D, Kats J, Molenaar D (2006) The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. Am Psychol 61: 726–728. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726.
- Piwowar HA, Becich MJ, Bilofsky H, Crowley RS (2008) Towards a data sharing culture: recommendations for leadership from academic health centers. PLoS Med 5: e183. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050183.
- Piwowar HA (2011) Who Shares? Who Doesn’t? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data. PLoS ONE 6(7): e18657. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018657.
- Carracedo A, Butler JM, Gusma˜o L, Parson W, Roewer L, et al. (2010) Publication of population data for forensic purposes. Forensic Sci Int Genet 4(3): 145–147. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.02.001.
- Parson W, Roewer L (2010) Publication of population data of linearly inherited DNA markers in the International Journal of Legal Medicine. Int J Legal Med 124(5): 505–509. doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0492-y.
- Parson W, Brandsta¨ tter A, Alonso A, Brandt N, Brinkmann B, et al. (2004) The EDNAP mitochondrial DNA population database (EMPOP) collaborative exercises: organisation, results and perspectives. Forensic Sci Int 139(2–3): 215–226. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.11.008.
- Willuweit S, Roewer L; International Forensic Y Chromosome User Group. (2007) Y chromosome haplotype reference database (YHRD): update. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 1(2): 83–87. doi 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.01.017. Sharing Data on Human Genetic Variation
Indice articolo:
- Introduzione -pag 1/10
- La condivisione dei dati: pro e contro - pag 2/10
- La condivisione dei dati in Genetica Umana - pag 3/10
- Materiali e Metodi - pag 4/10
- Risultati e Discussione - pag 5/10
- Campi ricerca, impact factor - pag 6/10
- Alcune proposte pratiche - pag 7/10
- Bibliografia - pag 8/10
- Tabella 1 - pag 9/10
- Tabella 2 - pag 10/10